Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33355
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPena, Julio-
dc.contributor.authorNAPOLES RUIZ, Gonzalo-
dc.contributor.authorSalgueiro, Yamisleydi-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T11:27:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-10T11:27:14Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2021-02-02T13:27:26Z-
dc.identifier.citationARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 54 (5) , p. 3817-3847-
dc.identifier.issn0269-2821-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/33355-
dc.description.abstractAttribute weighting is a task of paramount relevance in multi-attribute decision-making (MADM). Over the years, different approaches have been developed to face this problem. Despite the effort of the community, there is a lack of consensus on which method is the most suitable one for a given problem instance. This paper is the second part of a two-part survey on attribute weighting methods in MADM scenarios. The first part introduced a categorization in five classes while focusing on explicit weighting methods. The current paper addresses implicit and hybrid approaches. A total of 20 methods are analyzed in order to identify their strengths and limitations. Toward the end, we discuss possible alternatives to address the detected drawbacks, thus paving the road for further research directions. The implicit weighting with additional information category resulted in the most coherent approach to give effective solutions. Consequently, we encourage the development of future methods with additional preference information.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback. This paper was partially supported by the Special Research Fund (BOF) of Hasselt University through the project BOF20KV01.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSPRINGER-
dc.rightsSpringer Nature B.V. 2021-
dc.subject.otherAttribute weighting-
dc.subject.otherMultiple attribute decision making-
dc.subject.otherImplicit weighting methods-
dc.subject.otherHybrid weighting methods-
dc.titleImplicit and hybrid methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage3847-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage3817-
dc.identifier.volume54-
local.format.pages31-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesPena, J (corresponding author), Cent Univ La Villas, Ctr Studies Computat Mech & Numer Methods Engn, Santa Clara, Cuba.-
dc.description.notesjpena@uclv.cu; gonzalo.napoles@uhasselt.be; ysalgueiro@utalca.cl-
dc.description.otherPena, J (corresponding author), Cent Univ La Villas, Ctr Studies Computat Mech & Numer Methods Engn, Santa Clara, Cuba. jpena@uclv.cu; gonzalo.napoles@uhasselt.be; ysalgueiro@utalca.cl-
local.publisher.placeVAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedReview-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10462-020-09941-3-
dc.identifier.isi000604184300001-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7462-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
local.description.affiliation[Pena, Julio] Cent Univ La Villas, Ctr Studies Computat Mech & Numer Methods Engn, Santa Clara, Cuba.-
local.description.affiliation[Napoles, Gonzalo] Univ Hasselt, Fac Business Econ, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Napoles, Gonzalo] Tilburg Univ, Dept Cognit Sci & Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg, Netherlands.-
local.description.affiliation[Salgueiro, Yamisleydi] Univ Talca, Fac Engn, Dept Comp Sci, Campus Curico, Talca, Chile.-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.validationecoom 2022-
item.contributorPena, Julio-
item.contributorNAPOLES RUIZ, Gonzalo-
item.contributorSalgueiro, Yamisleydi-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationPena, Julio; NAPOLES RUIZ, Gonzalo & Salgueiro, Yamisleydi (2021) Implicit and hybrid methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study. In: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 54 (5) , p. 3817-3847.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn0269-2821-
crisitem.journal.eissn1573-7462-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
manuscript-clean.pdfPeer-reviewed author version412.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Implicit and hybrid methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making_ a review study.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Page view(s)

32
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Download(s)

26
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.