Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34785
Title: The European Union and Public Health Emergencies: Expert Opinions on the Management of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Suggestions for the Future Emergencies
Authors: Gontariuk, Marie
Krafft, Thomas
Rehbock, Cassandra
Townend, David
VAN DER AUWERMEULEN, Loth 
Pilot, Eva
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: 
Source: Frontiers in public health, 9 (Art N° 698995)
Abstract: Objective: The first wave of the coronavirus SARS-COV-2 pandemic has revealed a fragmented governance within the European Union (EU) to tackle public health emergencies. This qualitative study aims: 1) to understand the current EU position within the field of public health emergencies taking the case of the COVID-19 as an example by comparing and contrasting experiences from EU institutions and experts from various EU Member States at the beginning of the pandemic; and, 2) to identify and to formulate future EU pandemic strategies and actions based on experts' opinions. Methods: Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with public health experts from various European Member States and European Commission officials from May 2020 until August 2020. The transcripts were analyzed by Thematic Content Analysis (TCA), mainly a manifest content analysis. Results: This study demonstrated that the limited EU mandate in health hinders proper actions to prevent and tackle infectious disease outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The results showed that this limitation significantly impacted the ECDC, as the Member States' competence did not allow the agency to have more capacity. The European Commission has fulfilled its role of coordinating and supporting the Member States by facilitating networks and information exchange. However, EU intra-and inter-communication need further improvement. Although diverse EU instruments and mechanisms were found valid, their implementation needed to be faster and more efficient. The results pointed out that underlying political challenges in EU decision-making regarding health emergencies hinder the aligned response. It was stated that the Member States were not prepared, and due to the restriction of their mandate, EU institutions could not enforce binding guidelines. Additionally, the study explored future EU pandemic strategies and actions. Both, EU institutions and national experts suggested similar and clear recommendations regarding the ECDC, the investment, and future harmonized preparedness tools.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic;European public health;health emergencies;health policy;European governance;international health regulations;public health emergencies of international concern;joint procurement mechanism
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34785
e-ISSN: 2296-2565
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.698995
ISI #: 000693040500001
Rights: Copyright © 2021 Gontariuk, Krafft, Rehbock, Townend, Van der Auwermeulen and Pilot. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2022
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Frontiers_The European Union and Public Health Emergencies.pdfPublished version260.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Page view(s)

36
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

24
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.