Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37245
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPENG, Qiyao-
dc.contributor.authorGorter, W. S.-
dc.contributor.authorVERMOLEN, Fred-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T14:32:50Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-22T14:32:50Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.date.submitted2022-04-21T13:07:01Z-
dc.identifier.citationBIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/37245-
dc.description.abstractPlastic (permanent) deformations were earlier, modeled by a phenomenological model in Peng and Vermolen (Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19(6):2525-2551, 2020). In this manusctipt, we consider a more physics-based formulation that is based on morphoelasticity. We firstly introduce the morphoelasticity approach and investigate the impact of various input variables on the output parameters by sensitivity analysis. A comparison of both model formulations shows that both models give similar computational results. Furthermore, we carry out Monte Carlo simulations of the skin contraction model containing the morphoelasticity approach. Most statistical correlations from the two models are similar, however, the impact of the collagen density on the severeness of contraction is larger for the morphoelasticity model than for the phenomenological model.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG-
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License-
dc.subject.otherWound healing; Skin contractions; Phenomenological approach;-
dc.subject.otherMorphoelasticity; Force balance; Mechanics-
dc.titleComparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
local.format.pages17-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesPeng, Q (corresponding author), Leiden Univ, Math Inst, NL-2333 CA Niels Bohrweg, Netherlands.; Peng, Q (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol, Delft Inst Appl Math, Mekelweg 4, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands.; Peng, Q (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Sci, Computat Math Grp, Discipline Grp Math & Stat, Campus Diepenbeek,Agoralaan Gebouw D, BE-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
dc.description.notesQ.Peng@math.leidenuniv.nl-
local.publisher.placeTIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.statusEarly view-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000781033200001-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Peng, Q.] Leiden Univ, Math Inst, NL-2333 CA Niels Bohrweg, Netherlands.-
local.description.affiliation[Peng, Q.; Gorter, W. S.; Vermolen, F. J.] Delft Univ Technol, Delft Inst Appl Math, Mekelweg 4, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands.-
local.description.affiliation[Peng, Q.; Vermolen, F. J.] Hasselt Univ, Fac Sci, Computat Math Grp, Discipline Grp Math & Stat, Campus Diepenbeek,Agoralaan Gebouw D, BE-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.contributorPENG, Qiyao-
item.contributorGorter, W. S.-
item.contributorVERMOLEN, Fred-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2023-
item.fullcitationPENG, Qiyao; Gorter, W. S. & VERMOLEN, Fred (2022) Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix. In: BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn1617-7959-
crisitem.journal.eissn1617-7940-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s10237-022-01568-3.pdfPublished version3.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on May 1, 2024

Page view(s)

54
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

14
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.