Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37245
Title: Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix
Authors: PENG, Qiyao 
Gorter, W. S.
VERMOLEN, Fred 
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
Source: Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Abstract: Plastic (permanent) deformations were earlier, modeled by a phenomenological model in Peng and Vermolen (Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19(6):2525-2551, 2020). In this manusctipt, we consider a more physics-based formulation that is based on morphoelasticity. We firstly introduce the morphoelasticity approach and investigate the impact of various input variables on the output parameters by sensitivity analysis. A comparison of both model formulations shows that both models give similar computational results. Furthermore, we carry out Monte Carlo simulations of the skin contraction model containing the morphoelasticity approach. Most statistical correlations from the two models are similar, however, the impact of the collagen density on the severeness of contraction is larger for the morphoelasticity model than for the phenomenological model.
Notes: Peng, Q (corresponding author), Leiden Univ, Math Inst, NL-2333 CA Niels Bohrweg, Netherlands.; Peng, Q (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol, Delft Inst Appl Math, Mekelweg 4, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands.; Peng, Q (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Sci, Computat Math Grp, Discipline Grp Math & Stat, Campus Diepenbeek,Agoralaan Gebouw D, BE-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Q.Peng@math.leidenuniv.nl
Keywords: Wound healing;Skin contractions;Phenomenological approach;Morphoelasticity;Force balance;Mechanics
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37245
ISSN: 1617-7959
e-ISSN: 1617-7940
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3
ISI #: WOS:000781033200001
Rights: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2023
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s10237-022-01568-3.pdfPublished version3.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.