Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38054
Title: Day-to-day intrapersonal variability in mobility patterns and association with perceived stress: A cross-sectional study using GPS from 122 individuals in three European cities
Authors: Olsen, Jonathan R.
Nicholls, Natalie
Caryl, Fiona
Mendoza, Juan Orjuela
INT PANIS, Luc 
DONS, Evi 
LAEREMANS, Michelle 
Standaert , Arnout
Lee , Duncan
Avila-Palencia, Ione
de Nazelle, Audrey
Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark
Mitchell, Richard
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Source: SSM, population health, 19 (Art N° 101172)
Abstract: Many aspects of our life are related to our mobility patterns and individuals can exhibit strong tendencies towards routine in their daily lives. Intrapersonal day-to-day variability in mobility patterns has been associated with mental health outcomes. The study aims were: (a) calculate intrapersonal day-to-day variability in mobility metrics for three cities; (b) explore interpersonal variability in mobility metrics by sex, season and city, and (c) describe intrapersonal variability in mobility and their association with perceived stress.Data came from the Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches (PASTA) project, 122 eligible adults wore location measurement devices over 7-consecutive days, on three occasions during 2015 (Antwerp: 41, Barcelona: 41, London: 40). Participants completed the Short Form Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Day-today variability in mobility was explored via six mobility metrics using distance of GPS point from home (meters:m), distance travelled between consecutive GPS points (m) and energy expenditure (metabolic equivalents: METs) of each GPS point collected (n = 3,372,919). A Kruskal-Wallis H test determined whether the median daily mobility metrics differed by city, sex and season. Variance in correlation quantified day-to-day intrapersonal variability in mobility. Levene's tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to assess intrapersonal variability in mobility and perceived stress.There were differences in daily distance travelled, maximum distance from home and METS between individuals by sex, season and, for proportion of time at home also, by city. Intrapersonal variability across all mobility metrics were highly correlated;individuals had daily routines and largely stuck to them. We did not observe any association between stress and mobility. Individuals are habitual in their daily mobility patterns. This is useful for estimating environmental exposures and in fuelling simulation studies.
Notes: Olsen, JR (corresponding author), Univ Glasgow, MRC CSO Social & Publ Hlth Sci, Berkeley Sq,99 Berkeley St, Glasgow G3 7HR, Scotland.
jonathan.olsen@glasgow.ac.uk
Keywords: Human mobility;Day-to-day variability;Intrapersonal variability;Mental health;Perceived stress;Urban health
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38054
ISSN: 2352-8273
e-ISSN: 2352-8273
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101172
ISI #: WOS:000831731800002
Rights: 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2023
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.