Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38793
Title: Multiyear outcomes using sibling oocytes demonstrates safety and efficacy of a simplified culture system consistent with use in a low-cost IVF setting
Authors: OMBELET, Willem 
Van Blerkom, Jonathan
NARGUND, Geeta 
Van der Auwera, Ingrid
Janssen, Mia
Dhont, Nathalie
Bosmans, Eugene
BOSHOFF, Gerhard 
Vertessen, Viktor-Jan
Campo, Rudi
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Source: REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 45 (3) , p. 481 -490
Abstract: Research question: Can a novel closed simplified IVF culture system be used to achieve outcomes comparable to those obtained with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) followed by conventional culturing? Design: This analysis is part of a non-inferiority prospective study comparing ICSI and a simplified culture system (SCS) for gamete fertilization in a selected group of patients. According to protocol, sibling oocytes in intact cumulus-oocyte complexes were randomly distributed between ICSI and conventional insemination in the SCS. For women, selection criteria included being under 43 years of age and at least six eggs at retrieval. An inseminating motile sperm count >= 1 million was required. The primary outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy rate (> 12 weeks) per cycle; secondary outcome measures included fertilization rate, miscarriage rate and implantation rate (ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo). Results: From January 2016 until December 2019, 653 SCS/ICSI cycles were performed yielding a total of 7915 oocytes. The fertilization rate was 61.1% and 50.4% for SCS and ICSI (P < 0.0001), respectively. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 32.0% for SCS and 36.7% for ICSI (P = 0.27). Implantation rate was 30.6% for SCS and 34.4% for ICSI (P = 0.35). The miscarriage rate was 7.5% and 6.5% for SCS and ICSI, respectively (P = 0.75). Conclusion: No difference was found in ongoing pregnancy rate, implantation rate and the miscarriage rate between SCS and ICSI in this selected patient cohort.
Notes: Ombelet, W (corresponding author), ZOL, Genk Inst Fertil Technol, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Campus St Jan, Genk, Belgium.; Ombelet, W (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Med & Life Sci, Agoralaan, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
willem.ombelet@telenet.be
Keywords: Accessible IVF;Assisted reproduction;ICSI;Infertility care;Low-and middle-income countries;Simplified IVF
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38793
ISSN: 1472-6483
e-ISSN: 1472-6491
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.04.008
ISI #: 000862853900008
Rights: 2022 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. *Corresponding author. E-mail address: willem.ombelet@telenet.be (W. Ombelet). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rbmo.2022.04.008 1472-6483/© 2022 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Declaration: The authors report no financial or commercial conflicts of interest.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2023
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.