Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38903
Title: Bleeding risk differences after TAVR according to the ARC-HBR criteria: insights from SCOPE 2
Authors: Garot, Philippe
Neylon, Antoinette
Morice, Marie -Claude
Tamburino, Corrado
Bleiziffer, Sabine
Thiele, Holger
Scholtz, Smita
Schramm, Rene
Cockburn, James
Cunnington, Michael
Wolf, Alexander
Barbanti, Marco
Tchetche, Didier
Pagnotta, Paolo
Gilard, Martine
Bedogni, Francesco
Van Belle, Eric
Vasa-Nicotera, Mauca
Chieffo, Alaide
BOGAERTS, Kris 
Hengstenberg, Christian
Capodanno, Davide
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: EUROPA EDITION
Source: EuroIntervention, 18 (6) , p. 503 -+
Abstract: Background: The Academic Research Consortium - High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) initiative defined conditions associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related bleeding.Aims: We sought to further explore these HBR conditions in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).Methods: Patients from the SCOPE 2 trial were stratified by their bleeding risk status based on the ARC-HBR definitions. Baseline and procedural characteristics, as well as key clinical outcomes including Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3-5 bleeding, were compared in ARC-HBR positive (HBR+) and ARC-HBR negative (HBR-) patients.Results: Of 787 patients randomised in SCOPE 2 and included in this study, 633 were HBR+ (80.4%). Compared with HBR- patients, those HBR+ were older and more frequently presented with diabetes, a his-tory of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, prior cerebrovascular accident, and a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of 30-day mortality (STS-PROM) (4.9 +/- 2.9% vs 3.3%+/- 2.1%; p<0.0001). In addition, HBR+ patients were more frequently on oral anticoagulation therapy. At 1 year, HBR+ patients had higher rates of all-cause death (12.4% vs 4.3%, respectively, risk difference 8.09%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.76-12.41; p=0.0002); the rates of BARC 3-5 type bleeding were relatively high but not statistically different compared with HBR- patients (7.7% vs 6.1%, risk difference 1.67%; 95% CI: -2.72 to 6.06; p=0.46). Subgroup analyses for bleeding events showed no significant interaction in terms of STS-PROM score, age, or medications.Conclusions: The ARC-HBR criteria failed to isolate a subgroup of patients at higher bleeding risk in TAVR patients from a randomised trial. These findings have potential implications, especially for the selection of post-TAVR antithrombotic regimens based on individual bleeding-risk profiles. Specific HBR criteria should be defined for TAVR patients.
Notes: Garot, P (corresponding author), Hop Jacques Cartier, Inst Cardiovasc Paris Sud, 6 Ave Noyer Lambert, F-91300 Massy, France.
pgarot@angio-icps.com
Keywords: bleeding;TAVR
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38903
ISSN: 1774-024X
e-ISSN: 1969-6213
DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01048
ISI #: 000877728200011
Rights: Europa Digital & Publishing 2022. All rights reserved
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
bleeding-risk-differences-after-tavr-according-to-the-arc-hbr-criteria-insights-.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version628.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
BleedingRiskDifference-Submitted version.pdf
  Restricted Access
Peer-reviewed author version479.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.