Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38992
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBIELEN, Samantha-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-05T13:22:38Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-05T13:22:38Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.date.submitted2022-11-30T16:36:18Z-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Empirical Legal Studies Conference, Amsterdam, 01-09-2022 / 02-09-2022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/38992-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleCan interventions in the prosecution process improve deterrence? Evidence from a Belgian reform-
dc.typeConference Material-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate2022, September 1-2-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameInternational Empirical Legal Studies Conference-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceAmsterdam-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC2-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedConference Presentation-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorBIELEN, Samantha-
item.fullcitationBIELEN, Samantha (2022) Can interventions in the prosecution process improve deterrence? Evidence from a Belgian reform. In: International Empirical Legal Studies Conference, Amsterdam, 01-09-2022 / 02-09-2022.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abstract.docxConference material12.37 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.