Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/38992
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBIELEN, Samantha-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-05T13:22:38Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-05T13:22:38Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.date.submitted2022-11-30T16:36:18Z-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Empirical Legal Studies Conference, Amsterdam, 01-09-2022 / 02-09-2022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/38992-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleCan interventions in the prosecution process improve deterrence? Evidence from a Belgian reform-
dc.typeConference Material-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate01-09-2022 / 02-09-2022-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameInternational Empirical Legal Studies Conference-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceAmsterdam-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC2-
local.type.specifiedConference Presentation-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fullcitationBIELEN, Samantha (2022) Can interventions in the prosecution process improve deterrence? Evidence from a Belgian reform. In: International Empirical Legal Studies Conference, Amsterdam, 01-09-2022 / 02-09-2022.-
item.contributorBIELEN, Samantha-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abstract.docxConference material12.37 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on Aug 6, 2023

Download(s)

16
checked on Aug 6, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.