Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/40308
Title: Towards precision pain medicine for pain after cancer: the Cancer Pain Phenotyping Network multidisciplinary international guidelines for pain phenotyping using nociplastic pain criteria
Authors: Nijs , Jo
LAHOUSSE, Astrid 
Fontaine-de-las-Pennas, Christel
Madeleine, Pascal
Fontaine, Christel
Nishigami, Tomohiko
Desmedt, Christine
Vanhoeij, Marian
MOSTAQIM, Kenza 
Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I.
Kapreli, Eleni
Bilika, Paraskevi
Polli, Andrea
Leysen, Laurence
Elma, Omer
ROOSE, Eva 
Rheel, Emma
Yilmaz, Sevilay Tumkaya
DE BAETS, Liesbet 
Huyamans, Eva
Turk, Ali
Saracoglu, Ismail
Issue Date: 2023
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Source: BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 130 (5) , p. 611 -621
Abstract: Pain after cancer remains underestimated and undertreated. Precision medicine is a recent concept that refers to the ability to classify patients into subgroups that differ in their susceptibility to, biology, or prognosis of a particular disease, or in their response to a specific treatment, and thus to tailor treatment to the individual patient characteristics. Applying this to pain after cancer, the ability to classify post-cancer pain into the three major pain phenotypes (i.e. nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic pain) and tailor pain treatment accordingly, is an emerging issue. This is especially relevant because available evidence suggests that nociplastic pain is present in an important subgroup of those patients experiencing post-cancer pain. The 2021 International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) clinical criteria and grading system for nociplastic pain account for the need to identify and correctly classify patients according to the pain phenotype early in their treatment. These criteria are an important step towards precision pain medicine with great potential for the field of clinical oncology. Within this framework, the Cancer Pain Phenotyping (CANPPHE) Network, an international and interdisciplinary group of oncology clinicians and researchers from seven countries, applied the 2021 IASP clinical criteria for nociplastic pain to the growing population of those experiencing post-cancer pain. A manual is provided to allow clinicians to differentiate between predominant nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic pain after cancer. A seven-step diagnostic approach is presented and illustrated using cases to enhance understanding and encourage effective implementation of this approach in clinical practice.
Notes: Nijs, J (corresponding author), Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Phys Educ & Physiotherapy, Dept Physiotherapy Human Physiol & Anat, Pain Mot Res Grp PAIN, Brussels, Belgium.; Nijs, J (corresponding author), Univ Hosp Brussels, Dept Phys Med & Physiotherapy, Chron Pain Rehabil, Brussels, Belgium.; Nijs, J (corresponding author), Univ Gothenburg, Inst Neurosci & Physiol, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Hlth & Rehabil,Unit Physiotherapy, Gothenburg, Sweden.
jo.nijs@vub.be
Keywords: cancer pain;central sensitisation;guidelines;neuropathic pain;nociceptive pain;nociplastic pain;oncology;precision medicine
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/40308
ISSN: 0007-0912
e-ISSN: 1471-6771
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.013
ISI #: 000982140600001
Rights: 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Journal of Anaesthesia. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.