Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/40688
Title: Effect of pain neuroscience education after breast cancer surgery on pain, physical, and emotional functioning: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (EduCan trial)
Authors: Dams, Lore
Van der Gucht, Elien
Devoogdt, Nele
Smeets, Ann
Bernar, Koen
Morlion, Bart
Godderis, Lode
Haenen, Vincent
De Vrieze, Tessa
FIEUWS, Steffen 
Moloney, Niamh
Van Wilgen, Paul
Meeus , Mira
De Groef, An
Issue Date: 2023
Publisher: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Source: PAIN, 164 (7) , p. 1489 -1501
Abstract: Pain is one of the most common and long-lasting side effects reported by women surgically treated for breast cancer. Educational interventions may optimize the current physical therapy modalities for pain prevention or relief in this population. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is an educational intervention that explains the pain experience not only from a biomedical perspective but also the psychological and social factors that contribute to it. Through a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (EduCan trial) it was investigated if PNE, in addition to the standard physiotherapy program immediately after breast cancer surgery, was more effective over the course of 18 months postoperatively than providing a biomedical explanation for pain. Primary outcome was the change in pain-related disability (Pain Disability Index, 0-70) over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included change in pain intensity, upper limb function, physical activity level, and emotional functioning over 4, 6, 8, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Multivariate linear models for repeated (longitudinal) measures were used to compare changes. Preoperative and postoperative moderators of the change in pain-related disability were also explored. Of 184 participants randomized, the mean (SD) age in the PNE and biomedical education group was 55.4 (11.5) and 55.2 (11.4) years, respectively. The change in pain-related disability from baseline to 12 months postoperatively did not differ between the 2 groups (PNE 4.22 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-7.03], biomedical 5.53 [95% CI: 2.74-8.32], difference in change -1.31 [95% CI: -5.28 to 2.65], P = 0.516). Similar results were observed for all secondary outcomes. Future research should explore whether a more patient-tailored intervention would yield better results.
Notes: Dams, L (corresponding author), Univ Antwerp, Dept Rehabil Sci & Physiotherapy, Campus Drie Eiken Univ Pl 1,R315, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
lore.dams@uantwerpen.be; elienvandergucht@gmail.com;
nele.devoogdt@kuleuven.be; ann.smeets@uzleuven.be;
koen.bernar@uzleuven.be; bart.morlion@uzleuven.be;
lode.godderis@kuleuven.be; vincent.haenen@kuleuven.be;
tessa.devrieze@kuleuven.be; steffen.fieuws@kuleuven.be;
niamh.moloney@mq.edu.au; p.vanwilgen@transcare.nl;
mira.meeus@uantwerpen.be; an.degroef@kuleuven.be
Keywords: Breast cancer;Randomized controlled trial;Pain neuroscience education;Biopsychosocial;Pain-related disability
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/40688
ISSN: 0304-3959
e-ISSN: 1872-6623
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002838
ISI #: 001011949500008
Rights: 2023 International Association for the Study of Pain
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PAIN-D-22-00566 1489..1501.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version557.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Dams 2022_EduCan primary outcome_accepted.pdf
  Until 2024-07-01
Peer-reviewed author version1.85 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.