Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/42766
Title: Istore: a project on innovative statistical methodologies to improve rare diseases clinical trials in limited populations
Authors: Schoenen, Stefanie
VERBEECK, Johan 
Koletzko, Lukas
Brambilla, Isabella
Kuchenbuch, Mathieu
Dirani, Maya
Zimmermann, Georg
Dette, Holger
Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter
MOLENBERGHS, Geert 
Nabbout, Rima
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: BMC
Source: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 19 (1) (Art N° 96)
Abstract: BackgroundThe conduct of rare disease clinical trials is still hampered by methodological problems. The number of patients suffering from a rare condition is variable, but may be very small and unfortunately statistical problems for small and finite populations have received less consideration. This paper describes the outline of the iSTORE project, its ambitions, and its methodological approaches.MethodsIn very small populations, methodological challenges exacerbate. iSTORE's ambition is to develop a comprehensive perspective on natural history course modelling through multiple endpoint methodologies, subgroup similarity identification, and improving level of evidence.ResultsThe methodological approaches cover methods for sound scientific modeling of natural history course data, showing similarity between subgroups, defining, and analyzing multiple endpoints and quantifying the level of evidence in multiple endpoint trials that are often hampered by bias.ConclusionThrough its expected results, iSTORE will contribute to the rare diseases research field by providing an approach to better inform about and thus being able to plan a clinical trial. The methodological derivations can be synchronized and transferability will be outlined.
Notes: Hilgers, RD (corresponding author), Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Med Stat, Pauwelsstr 19, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.
rhilgers@ukaachen.de
Keywords: Bias assessment with multiple endpoints;Finite populations;Multiple endpoints;Natural history modelling;Rare disease clinical trials;Similarity of subgroups
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/42766
e-ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03103-2
ISI #: WOS:001179347800001
Rights: The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecom‑ mons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.