Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47661
Title: Manual Dexterity Abilities and Dual Tasking in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder and Typically Developing Children
Authors: Bieber, Eleonora
Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien
Sgandurra, Giuseppina
Martini, Giada
Basu, Anna
Guzzetta, Andrea
Cioni, Giovanni
Feys, Hilde
KLINGELS, Katrijn 
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: WILEY
Source: Journal of clinical psychology,
Status: Early view
Abstract: Poor manual skills in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) may be dependent on task complexity and due to difficulties in the automatization phase of the motor learning process. Increased task demands and the dual-task paradigm can be used to test these hypotheses.Objectives We aim to investigate (1) manual dexterity abilities using increased levels of difficulty; (2) dual tasking using an experimental protocol of the Tyneside Pegboard Test (TPT).Method Sixteen children with DCD and 16 age-matched typically developing (TD) children were included. Various experimental conditions of the TPT (unimanual, bimanual and dual task) were administered. The dual-task paradigm comprised a primary unimanual task and a cognitive task (auditory non-verbal task). Parents were asked to fill out the eConners questionnaire to report attentional difficulties. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare possible differences in effects on the performance of the groups. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between dual-task performance and ADHD index of the eConners questionnaire.Results Children with DCD performed significantly worse in all task conditions (unimanual, bimanual, dual task) compared to TD children. In unimanual and bimanual conditions, they did no not present a higher impact of task constraints. Dual-task performances did not have a differential effect on groups and were not interfered by attentional difficulties.Conclusions Children with DCD exhibit a general slowness in all TPT tasks. Our findings do not support the automatization deficit hypothesis.
Notes: Bieber, E (corresponding author), IRCCS Fdn Stella Maris, Dept Dev Neurosci, Pisa, Italy.
eleonora.bieber@fsm.unipi.it
Keywords: assessment;cognitive functioning;neuroscience
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47661
ISSN: 0021-9762
e-ISSN: 1097-4679
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.70051
ISI #: 001596651000001
Rights: 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Clinical Psychology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.