Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49001
Title: Role of provocation and exercise imaging for the identification of candidates for cardiac myosin inhibitors
Authors: ERZEEL, Jonas 
DHONT, Sebastiaan 
VAN ES, Marnicq 
Ulgar, Duhan
BERTRAND, Philippe 
MULLENS, Wilfried 
MARTENS, Pieter 
Issue Date: 2026
Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Source: ESC heart failure, 13 (2) (Art N° xvag087)
Abstract: Aims Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) drives symptoms and functional limitation in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Some patients may only show treatment-qualifying obstruction during exercise echocardiography, yet their clinical profile and response to cardiac myosin inhibition are not well defined. This study compared the characteristics and therapeutic response of patients requiring exercise echocardiography to establish eligibility for mavacamten versus those meeting criteria at rest or during Valsalva. Methods and results A single-centre retrospective cohort of 56 symptomatic oHCM patients treated with mavacamten was evaluated. LVOTO was assessed at rest, with Valsalva, and during exercise; patients were classified as 'exercise' or 'non-exercise' LVOTO based on the provocation manoeuvre eliciting a qualifying gradient (>= 50 mmHg). Haemodynamic (Valsalva LVOT gradient) and symptomatic (NYHA class) response were assessed at 12 and 24 weeks. A total of 42.9% qualified for mavacamten exclusively during exercise echocardiography. Although resting and Valsalva gradients were lower by definition, these patients showed similar baseline functional limitation and exercise capacity (pVO2; 17.9 +/- 7.4 vs. 16.8 +/- 5.5 mL/kg/min, P = .550). By 24 weeks, most patients in both groups achieved non-obstructive gradients (<30 mmHg; 93.3% vs. 96.4%, P = .646) and NYHA class improvement (75.0% vs. 93.3%, P = .266), without significant between-group differences. Conclusion Patients requiring exercise echocardiography to document treatment-qualifying LVOTO do not exhibit a milder disease phenotype and derive similar treatment benefits from mavacamten compared to those with resting or Valsalva-provoked obstruction. Exercise echocardiography identifies a substantial proportion of symptomatic HCM patients with significant LVOTO missed by resting assessment and is essential for guiding treatment eligibility.
Notes: Martens, P (corresponding author), Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Dept Cardiol, Genk, Belgium.; Martens, P (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Med & Life Sci, LCRC, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Pieter.martens2@zol.be
Keywords: Hypertrophic cardio;myopathy;Left-ventricular outflow tract obstruction;Exercise
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49001
ISSN: 2055-5822
e-ISSN: 2055-5822
DOI: 10.1093/eschf/xvag087
ISI #: 001737856300001
Rights: The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
xvag087.pdfPublished version577.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.