Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49696Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hooyberghs, Jef | - |
| dc.contributor.author | MANGELSCHOTS, Thibau | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-29T13:09:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-29T13:09:31Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-07-02T08:58:42Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49696 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | DNA-hybridisation-based biosensing stands at the forefront of liquid biopsy development and, consequently, the next generation of non-invasive tumour detection. These biosensors are fundamentally limited by the thermodynamic challenge of discriminating trace single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) from the large excess of wild-type DNA background. Recent advances indicate that incorporating structural constraints in the design of molecular beacon-based OWL sensors can significantly enhance their selectivity. However, the underlying mechanism behind these constraints remains speculative. In this work, we test the hypothesis that these constraints induce torsional strain within these probes and seek to optimise their working regime by developing an analytically solvable coarse-grained model. The sensor is modelled as a one-dimensional lattice system in which nodes are coupled via harmonic interactions of exponentially decaying (Kac-Baker-like) strength. Through the Schur complement of the twist coordinate of the cgDNA+ stiffness matrix, the model effectively accounts for the higher-dimensional degrees of freedom in the DNA duplex. In a general framework, we aim to identify the non-additive free-energy interaction term ΔΔF that arises between two perturbations in the system, and then analyse its application to the presence of a single-base mismatch and to global frustration in the system. This approach allows us to analyse regimes in which the mismatch destabilises the duplex. Specifically, we demonstrate that an optimisable destabilising regime exists for any softening mismatch within this framework, consistent with the expected mechanical effect of a mismatch. To validate the hypothesis that these constraints induce torsional frustration in the sensor, we perform coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations with the oxDNA LAMMPS module. We construct a closed-loop system resembling OWL sensors. This closed loop is expected to impose significant structural strain because the 9-base-pair hybridising region is incompatible with DNA’s natural helical periodicity (∼ 10.4 bp). This structure is subsequently compared with its helically compatible 10-base-pair counterpart and an open-loop variant. Using 3DNA analysis, we can extract physical degrees of freedom from the simulated duplexes and find that bending of the hybridised region, rather than twist, imposes the dominant contribution to strain. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | KU Leuven | - |
| dc.rights | © Copyright by KU Leuven Without prior written permission from both the supervisor(s) and the author(s), copying, reproducing, using, or realising this publication or parts thereof is prohibited. For requests or information regarding the copying and/or use and/or realisation of parts of this publication, please contact KU Leuven, Faculty of Science, Celestijnenlaan 200H - box 2100, 3001 Leuven (Heverlee), Telephone +32 16 32 14 01. Prior written permission from the supervisor(s) is also required for using the (original) methods, products, circuits, and programs described in this work for industrial or commercial purposes, and for submitting this publication for scientific awards or contests | - |
| dc.subject.other | DNA | - |
| dc.subject.other | OWL sensors | - |
| dc.subject.other | Hybridisation-based biosensors | - |
| dc.subject.other | Strain-mismatch interaction | - |
| dc.title | Analytical Model for OWL Sensors: A look at the Strain-Mismatch interaction in DNA | - |
| dc.type | Theses and Dissertations | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | T2 | - |
| dc.relation.references | [1] Yannick Stulens et al. “Breaking the Limit of Hybridization Selectivity by Strain-forming Probes and Wild-type Blocker”. Unpublished manuscript. [2] Liwei Ma et al. “Liquid biopsy in cancer: current status, challenges and future prospects”. In: Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 9.1 (Dec. 2024), p. 336. doi: 10.1038/ s41392-024-02021-w. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-02021-w. [3] Stefania Napolitano et al. “Liquid Biopsy at Home: Delivering Precision Medicine for Patients with Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic”. In: The Oncologist 27.8 (Mar. 2022), e633–e641. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac071. url: https://doi.org/10. 1093/oncolo/oyac071. [4] AlexNesta, Denisse Tafur, and Christine Beck. “Hotspots of Human Mutation”. In: Trends in Genetics 37 (Nov. 2020). doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.10.003. [5] Khin Zay Yar Myint et al. “Identification of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) from the liquid biopsy results: Findings from an observational cohort study”. In: Cancer Treatment and Research Communications 35 (Jan. 2023), p. 100701. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc. 2023.100701. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100701. [6] OpenAI. Schematic Illustration of Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) andWild-Type DNA (wtDNA)Released by Tumour Cells into the Bloodstream. Image generated using ChatGPT (GPT-5.5) by OpenAI. Generated on 20 May 2026. Available at: https://chat.openai.com/. San Francisco, CA, 2026. [7] International Society of Genetic Genealogy. Single-nucleotide polymorphism. ISOGG Wiki. 2024. url: https://isogg.org/wiki/Single-nucleotide_polymorphism (visited on 04/27/2026). [8] Rebekka Van Hoof et al. “Depletion of wild-type target enhances the hybridization-based sensitivity of low-abundant mutation detection by reference capture probes”. In: Sensors and Actuators B Chemical 368 (June 2022), p. 132175. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2022. 132175. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.132175. [9] Yannick Stulens et al. “Hybridization-based sensor with large dynamic range for detection of circulating tumor DNA in clinical samples”. In: Biosensors and Bioelectronics 281 (Apr. 2025), p. 117342. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2025.117342. url: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.bios.2025.117342. [10] Rebekah J. Karadeema et al. “The owl sensor: a ‘fragile’ DNA nanostructure for the analysis of single nucleotide variations”. In: Nanoscale 10.21 (Jan. 2018), pp. 10116– 10122. doi: 10.1039/c8nr01107a. url: https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr01107a. 75 [11] Brittany L. Mueller, Mark J. Liberman, and Dmitry M. Kolpashchikov. “OWL2: a molecular beacon-based nanostructure for highly selective detection of single-nucleotide variations in folded nucleic acids”. In: Nanoscale 15.12 (Jan. 2023), pp. 5735–5742. doi: 10.1039/d2nr05590b. [12] Cai-Hong Yun et al. “The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105.6 (Jan. 2008), pp. 2070–2075. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709662105. url: https: //doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709662105. [13] Hugh Osborn. Advanced Quantum Field Theory. https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/ user/ho/AQFTNotes.pdf. Lecture notes, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge; Lent Term 2013. Originally typeset by Steffen Gielen (2007), revised by Carl Turner (2013), latest update October 30, 2019. 2019. [14] Wikipedia contributors. Matrix determinant lemma—Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Matrix_determinant_ lemma&oldid=1301760752. [Online; accessed 27-September-2025]. 2025. [15] Yue Hao and Valeria Simoncini. “The Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury formula for generalized linear matrix equations and applications”. In: Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications 28 (May 2021). doi: 10.1002/nla.2384. [16] Stephen Pollock. “Circulant matrices and time-series analysis”. In: International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 33 (Jan. 2002), pp. 213–230. doi: 10.1080/00207390110118953. [17] P.J. Davis. Circulant Matrices. AMS Chelsea Publishing Series. American Mathematical Society, 2013. isbn: 9780821891650. url: https://books.google.be/books?id= OpHbzQEACAAJ. [18] Robert M. Gray. “Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices: A Review”. In: Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory 2.3 (2006), pp. 155–239. doi: 10. 1561/0100000006. url: https://ee.stanford.edu/~gray/toeplitz.pdf. [19] Giulia Rossetti et al. “The structural impact of DNA mismatches”. In: Nucleic Acids Research 43.8 (Apr. 2015), pp. 4309–4321. issn: 0305-1048. doi: 10 . 1093 / nar / gkv254. eprint: https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-pdf/43/8/4309/ 17436586/gkv254.pdf. url: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv254. [20] William N. Hunter et al. “Refined crystal structure of an octanucleotide duplex with G · T mismatched base-pairs”. In: Journal of Molecular Biology 190.4 (1986), pp. 605–618. issn: 0022-2836. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(86)90246-9. url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022283686902469. [21] Herbert Goldstein. Classical Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, 1980. [22] Enrico Skoruppa et al. “Length-scale-dependent elasticity in DNA from coarse-grained and all-atom models”. In: Phys. Rev. E 103 (4 Apr. 2021), p. 042408. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevE.103.042408. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE. 103.042408. 76 [23] George A. Baker Jr. “One-Dimensional Order-Disorder Model Which Approaches a Phase Transition”. In: Phys. Rev. 122 (5 June 1961), pp. 1477–1484. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev. 122.1477. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.122.1477. [24] Rahul Sharma et al. “cgNA+web : A Visual Interface to the cgNA+ Sequence-dependent Statistical Mechanics Model of Double-strandedNucleicAcids”. In: Journal of Molecular Biology 435.14 (2023). Computation Resources for Molecular Biology, p. 167978. issn: 0022-2836. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2023.167978. url: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283623000347. [25] D. Petkeviči¯ut˙e et al. “cgDNA: a software package for the prediction of sequencedependent coarse-grain free energies of B-form DNA”. In: Nucleic Acids Research 42.20 (Sept. 2014), e153. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku825. url: https://doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gku825. [26] Alessandro Samuele Patelli. “A sequence-dependent coarse-grain model of B-DNA with explicit description of bases and phosphate groups parametrised from large scale Molecular Dynamics simulations”. In: Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (Jan. 2019). doi: 10.5075/epfl-thesis-9552. url: https://infoscience.epfl. ch/handle/20.500.14299/159987. [27] Wout Laeremans et al. “Insights into elastic properties of coarse-grained DNA models: q-stiffness of cgDNA vs cgDNA+”. In: The Journal of Chemical Physics 160.14 (Apr. 2024). issn: 1089-7690. doi: 10.1063/5.0197053. url: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1063/5.0197053. [28] Qiang Du, Xiantao Li, and Liming Yuan. “Analysis of Coarse-Grained lattice models and connections to nonlocal interactions”. In: CSIAM Transactions on Applied Mathematics 1.1 (Apr. 2020), pp. 155–185. doi: 10.4208/csiam-am.2020-0009. url: https: //doi.org/10.4208/csiam-am.2020-0009. [29] Jean Gallier. Geometric Methods and Applications. Springer, Jan. 2011. doi: 10.1007/ 978-1-4419-9961-0. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9961-0. [30] Chris Yeh. Schur complements and the Matrix inversion Lemma. May 2021. url: https: //chrisyeh96.github.io/2021/05/19/schur-complement.html. [31] Xavier Viader-Godoy, Maria Manosas, and Felix Ritort. “Stacking correlation length in single-stranded DNA”. In: Nucleic Acids Research 52.21 (Oct. 2024), pp. 13243–13254. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae934. url: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae934. [32] Mario González-Jiménez et al. “Low-frequency vibrational modes in G-quadruplexes reveal the mechanical properties of nucleic acids”. In: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 23.23 (Jan. 2021), pp. 13250–13260. doi: 10.1039/d0cp05404f. url: https: //doi.org/10.1039/d0cp05404f. [33] Midas Segers et al. “Mechanical properties of nucleic acids and the non-local twistable wormlike chain model”. In: The Journal of Chemical Physics 156.23 (June 2022). issn: 1089-7690. doi: 10.1063/5.0089166. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5. 0089166. [34] Stefanos K. Nomidis et al. “Twist-bend coupling and the statistical mechanics of the twistable wormlike-chain model of DNA: Perturbation theory and beyond”. In: Physical review. E 99.3 (Mar. 2019), p. 032414. doi: 10.1103/physreve.99.032414. url: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.99.032414. 77 [35] Mark Kac. “On the Partition Function of a One-Dimensional Gas”. In: Phys. Fluids 2 (1 Jan. 1959), pp. 8–12. doi: 10.1063/1.1724399. url: https://doi.org/10.1063/ 1.1724399. [36] Serge F. Mingaleev et al. “Kinks in the discrete sine-Gordon model with Kac-Baker long-range interactions”. In: Physical Review E 61.4 (Apr. 2000), pp. 4454–4461. issn: 1095-3787. doi: 10.1103/physreve.61.4454. url: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevE.61.4454. [37] KlausBMøller and Niels E Henriksen. “Onwave-packet dynamics in a decaying quadratic potential”. In: Physica Scripta 55.5 (May 1997), p. 542. doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/55/ 5/005. url: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/55/5/005. [38] Midas Segers et al. “Mechanisms of DNA-Mediated Allostery”. In: Physical Review Letters 131.23 (Dec. 2023). issn: 1079-7114. doi: 10 . 1103 / physrevlett . 131 . 238402. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.238402. [39] Andrey A. Gorin, Victor B. Zhurkin, and Wilma K. “B-DNA Twisting Correlates with Base-pair Morphology”. In: Journal of Molecular Biology 247.1 (1995), pp. 34–48. issn: 0022-2836. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1994.0120. url: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283684701203. [40] H Herzel et al. “Interpreting correlations in biosequences”. In: Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 249.1 (1998), pp. 449–459. issn: 0378-4371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 4371(97)00505- 0. url: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437197005050. [41] Chung-Kang Peng et al. “Long Range Correlations in Nucleotide Sequences”. In: Nature 356 (Apr. 1992), pp. 168–70. doi: 10.1038/356168a0. [42] Riccardo Fantoni. “Exact Results for One Dimensional Fluids Through Functional Integration”. In: Journal of Statistical Physics 163.6 (2016), pp. 1247–1267. doi: 10.1007/ s10955-016-1510-3. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-016-1510-3. [43] Zev Bryant et al. “Structural transitions and elasticity from torque measurements on DNA”. In: Nature 424.6946 (2003), pp. 338–341. doi: 10.1038/nature01810. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01810. [44] Bryan C. Daniels and James P. Sethna. “Nucleation at the DNA supercoiling transition”. In: Physical Review E 83.4 (Apr. 2011), p. 041924. doi: 10.1103/physreve.83. 041924. url: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.83.041924. [45] Terence Hwa et al. “Localization of denaturation bubbles in random DNA sequences”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100.8 (Apr. 2003), pp. 4411–4416. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0736291100. url: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0736291100. [46] Hatim Allawi and John Santalucia. “Thermodynamics and NMR of internal GT mismatches in DNA”. In: Biochemistry 36 (Sept. 1997), pp. 10581–94. doi: 10.1021/ bi962590c. [47] Hatim T. Allawi and John SantaLucia. “Nearest Neighbor Thermodynamic Parameters for Internal G·A Mismatches in DNA”. In: Biochemistry 37.8 (1998). PMID: 9485363, pp. 2170–2179. doi: 10.1021/bi9724873. eprint: https://doi.org/10.1021/ bi9724873. url: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9724873. 78 [48] H. Allawi and John SantaLucia. “NMR solution structure of aDNAdodecamer containing single G*T mismatches”. In: Nucleic Acids Research 26.21 (Nov. 1998), pp. 4925–4934. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.21.4925. url: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.21. 4925. [49] Masayuki Shibata, Theresa Julia Zielinski, and Robert Rein. “A molecular dynamics study of the effect of G · T mispairs on the conformation of DNA in solution”. In: Biopolymers 31.2 (Feb. 1991), pp. 211–232. doi: 10 . 1002 / bip . 360310209. url: https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.360310209. [50] Petra Imhof and Mai Zahran. “The effect of a G:T mispair on the dynamics of DNA”. In: PLoS ONE 8.1 (Jan. 2013), e53305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053305. url: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053305. [51] Pablo D. Dans et al. “Exploring polymorphisms in B-DNA helical conformations”. In: Nucleic Acids Research 40.21 (Nov. 2012), pp. 10668–10678. issn: 0305-1048. doi: 10 . 1093 / nar / gks884. eprint: https : / / academic . oup . com / nar / article - pdf/40/21/10668/16962473/gks884.pdf. url: https://doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gks884. [52] Ivonne Otero-Navas and Jorge M. Seminario. “Molecular electrostatic potentials of DNA base–base pairing and mispairing”. In: Journal of Molecular Modeling 18.1 (Apr. 2011), pp. 91–101. doi: 10.1007/s00894-011-1028-1. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00894-011-1028-1. [53] F. Landuzzi et al. “Detection of single DNA mismatches by force spectroscopy in short DNA hairpins”. In: The Journal of Chemical Physics 152.7 (Feb. 2020), p. 074204. doi: 10.1063/1.5139284. url: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139284. [54] E. Carlon, M. Laleman, and S. Nomidis. “Computational Physics: Molecular Dynamics Simulations”. Unpublished lecture notes, KU Leuven, Academic Year 2025–2026. 2025. [55] Michael Matthies, Matthew Sample, and Petr Šulc. Coarse-grained simulations of DNA and RNA systems with oxDNA and oxRNA models: Introductory tutorial. 2023. arXiv: 2308.01455 [physics.bio-ph]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01455. [56] Joakim Bohlin et al. “Design and simulation of DNA, RNA and hybrid protein–nucleic acid nanostructures with oxView”. In: Nature Protocols 17.8 (June 2022), pp. 1762–1788. doi: 10.1038/s41596-022-00688-5. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596- 022-00688-5. [57] Erik Poppleton et al. “Design, optimization and analysis of large DNA and RNA nanostructures through interactive visualization, editing and molecular simulation”. In: Nucleic Acids Research 48.12 (May 2020), e72. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa417. url: https: //doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa417. [58] A. Sengar et al. “A Primer on the oxDNA Model of DNA: When to Use it, How to Simulate it and How to Interpret the Results”. In: Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 8 (June 2021), p. 693710. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.693710. url: https://doi. org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.693710. [59] Benedict E. K. Snodin et al. “Introducing improved structural properties and salt dependence into a coarse-grained model of DNA”. In: The Journal of Chemical Physics 142.23 (June 2015). doi: 10.1063/1.4921957. url: https://doi.org/10.1063/1. 4921957. 79 [60] Natalie Haley et al. “Design of hidden thermodynamic driving for non-equilibrium systems via mismatch elimination during DNA strand displacement”. In: Nature Communications 11 (May 2020), p. 2562. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16353-y. [61] Thomas E. Ouldridge, Ard A. Louis, and Jonathan P. K. Doye. “Structural, mechanical, and thermodynamic properties of a coarse-grained DNA model”. In: The Journal of Chemical Physics 134.8 (Feb. 2011), p. 085101. doi: 10 . 1063 / 1 . 3552946. url: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3552946. [62] A. Sengar et al. “A Primer on the oxDNA Model of DNA: When to Use it, How to Simulate it and How to Interpret the Results”. In: Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 8 (June 2021). issn: 2296-889X. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.693710. url: http: //dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.693710. [63] Oliver Henrich et al. “Coarse-grained simulation of DNA using LAMMPS: An implementation of the oxDNA model and its applications”. In: The European Physical Journal E 41.5 (May 2018). issn: 1292-895X. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2018- 11669- 8. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2018-11669-8. [64] A. P. Thompson et al. “LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales”. In: Comp. Phys. Comm. 271 (2022), p. 108171. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171. [65] Antonio Suma et al. “TacoxDNA: A user-friendly web server for simulations of complex DNA structures, from single strands to origami”. In: Journal of Computational Chemistry 40.29 (2019), pp. 2586–2595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.26029. eprint: https : / / onlinelibrary . wiley . com / doi / pdf / 10 . 1002 / jcc . 26029. url: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jcc.26029. [66] Eric F. Pettersen et al. “UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers”. In: Protein Science 30.1 (Sept. 2020), pp. 70–82. doi: 10.1002/ pro.3943. url: https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3943. [67] X.-j. Lu andWilma K. Olson. “3DNA: a software package for the analysis, rebuilding and visualization of three-dimensional nucleic acid structures”. In: Nucleic Acids Research 31.17 (Aug. 2003), pp. 5108–5121. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg680. url: https://doi. org/10.1093/nar/gkg680. [68] Wilma K Olson et al. “A standard reference frame for the description of nucleic acid basepair geometry”. In: Journal of Molecular Biology 313.1 (Oct. 2001), pp. 229–237. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4987. url: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2001.4987. [69] David R. Bevan et al. “Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the d(CCAACGTTGG)2 Decamer: Influence of the Crystal Environment”. In: Biophysical Journal 78.2 (Feb. 2000), pp. 668–682. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76625-2. url: https://doi. org/10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76625-2. [70] Minjung Kim et al. “Sequence-dependent twist-bend coupling in DNA minicircles”. In: Nanoscale 13.47 (Jan. 2021), pp. 20186–20196. doi: 10.1039/d1nr04672a. url: https://doi.org/10.1039/d1nr04672a. [71] D.C. Lay. Linear Algebra and Its Applications.Addison-Wesley, 2012. isbn: 9780321385178. url: https://books.google.be/books?id=_4bjtgAACAAJ. 80 | - |
| local.type.refereed | Non-Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Master thesis | - |
| local.provider.type | - | |
| local.uhasselt.international | no | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.contributor | MANGELSCHOTS, Thibau | - |
| item.fullcitation | MANGELSCHOTS, Thibau (2026) Analytical Model for OWL Sensors: A look at the Strain-Mismatch interaction in DNA. | - |
| item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Master_thesis_TM_final.pdf | Published version | 14.15 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.