Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/6768
Title: | On the variability of covariate adjustment: experience with Koch's method for evaluating the absolute difference in proportions in randomized clinical trials | Authors: | LESAFFRE, Emmanuel BOGAERTS, Kris Li, X. Bluhmki, E. |
Issue Date: | 2002 | Publisher: | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV | Source: | Controlled clinical trials, 23. p. 127-142 | Abstract: | recently Koch et al. suggested an interesting approach for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials. Here we report our experience with the approach in Assent II, a large randomized trial comparing 30-day mortality rates of two thrombolytic treatments. Data from the Gusto-I study and a recent successor to the Assent II will also be used. Further, we balance the advantage of covariate adjustment(with Koch's method) to the extra efforts and resources necessary. In this context we highlight the fact that there is a potential risk of using a covariate-adjusted analysis as primary analysis and show that covariate adjustment has the least effect when it is needed most. Analytic results will be given to quantify this risk and a simulation study illustrates our findings. | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/6768 | ISSN: | 0197-2456 | DOI: | 10.1016/S0197-2456(01)00201-X | ISI #: | 000174858200003 | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Show full item record
SCOPUSTM
Citations
6
checked on Sep 3, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
6
checked on Oct 12, 2024
Page view(s)
54
checked on Sep 10, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.