Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/8446
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoethals, K-
dc.contributor.authorJANSSEN, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorDUCHATEAU, Luc-
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-05T14:19:54Z-
dc.date.available2008-09-05T14:19:54Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 35(9). p. 1071-1079-
dc.identifier.issn0266-4763-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/8446-
dc.description.abstractCopulas and frailty models are important tools to model bivariate survival data. Equivalence between Archimedean copula models and shared frailty models, e.g. between the Clayton-Oakes copula model and the shared gamma frailty model, has often been claimed in the literature. In this note we show that, in both the models, there is indeed a well-known equivalence between the copula functions; the modeling of the marginal survival functions, however, is quite different. The latter fact leads to different joint survival functions.-
dc.format.extent129806 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD-
dc.subject.otherbivariate survival data; Clayton-Oakes copula; positive stable frailty; shared gamma frailty model-
dc.titleFrailty models and copulas: similarities and differences-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage1079-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spage1071-
dc.identifier.volume35-
local.format.pages9-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesUniv Ghent, Dept Physiol & Biometr, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. Hasselt Univ, Ctr Stat, Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02664760802271389-
dc.identifier.isi000258090800010-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorGoethals, K-
item.contributorJANSSEN, Paul-
item.contributorDUCHATEAU, Luc-
item.fullcitationGoethals, K; JANSSEN, Paul & DUCHATEAU, Luc (2008) Frailty models and copulas: similarities and differences. In: JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 35(9). p. 1071-1079.-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.validationecoom 2009-
crisitem.journal.issn0266-4763-
crisitem.journal.eissn1360-0532-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Goethals2008.pdf126.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.