Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/9753
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-19T07:28:08Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationDRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 43(4). p. 409-429-
dc.identifier.issn0092-8615-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/9753-
dc.description.abstractStatistical analysis often extends beyond the data available. This is especially true when data are incompletely recorded because ad hoc as well as model-based approaches are rooted not only in the observed data and the mechanism governing missingness, but also in the unobserved given the observed data. Other instances of this phenomenon include but are not limited to censored time-to-event data, random effects models, and latent class approaches. One needs to be aware of (1) changes in results and intuition relative to complete-data analysis; (2) the assumptions under which such approaches are valid; (3) the sensitivities implied by departures; and (4) in response to these, what sensitivity analysis avenues are available. This article provides a bird's-eye perspective on these. Some of the developments are illustrated using data from a clinical trial in onychomycosis.-
dc.format.extent429284 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherDRUG INFORMATION ASSOC-
dc.rights(c) 2009 Drug Information Association Inc.-
dc.subject.otherLinear mixed model; Missing at random; Missing completely at random; Non-future dependence; Pattern-mixture model; Selection model; Shared-parameter model-
dc.subject.otherlinear mixed model; missing at random; missing completely at random; non-future dependence; pattern-mixture model; selection model; shared-parameter model-
dc.titleIncomplete Data in Clinical Studies: Analysis, Sensitivity, and Sensitivity Analysis-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage429-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage409-
dc.identifier.volume43-
local.format.pages21-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesUniv Hasselt, Ctr Stat, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.isi000267877500004-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationMOLENBERGHS, Geert (2009) Incomplete Data in Clinical Studies: Analysis, Sensitivity, and Sensitivity Analysis. In: DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 43(4). p. 409-429.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.contributorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
item.validationecoom 2010-
crisitem.journal.issn0092-8615-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
dijmiss02.pdfPeer-reviewed author version429.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
out (3).pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.61 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on May 10, 2024

Page view(s)

60
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

218
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.