Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/1469
Title: Model selection for incomplete and design-based samples
Authors: HENS, Niel 
AERTS, Marc 
MOLENBERGHS, Geert 
Issue Date: 2006
Source: STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 25(14). p. 2502-2520
Abstract: The Akaike information criterion, AIC, is one of the most frequently used methods to select one or a few good, optimal regression models from a set of candidate models. In case the sample is incomplete, the naive use of this criterion on the so-called complete cases can lead to the selection of poor or inappropriate models. A similar problem occurs when a sample based on a design with unequal selection probabilities, is treated as a simple random sample. In this paper, we consider a modification of AIC, based on reweighing the sample in analogy with the weighted Horvitz-Thompson estimates. It is shown that this weighted AIC-criterion provides better model choices for both incomplete and design-based samples. The use of the weighted AIC-criterion is illustrated on data from the Belgian Health Interview Survey, which motivated this research. Simulations show its performance in a variety of settings. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: missing data; weighted likelihood; model selection; complex designs; Akaike information criterion; WEIGHTED LIKELIHOOD METHODOLOGY; AKAIKE INFORMATION CRITERION; ESTIMATING EQUATIONS; REGRESSION; 2-STAGE; FIT;missing data; weighted likelihood; model selection; complex designs; Akaike information criterion
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/1469
ISSN: 0277-6715
e-ISSN: 1097-0258
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2559
ISI #: 000239052300011
Rights: (C) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2007
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hens2006.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version196.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Model_selection_for_incomplete_and_desig.pdfPeer-reviewed author version473.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

45
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

52
checked on Oct 9, 2024

Page view(s)

108
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

326
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.