Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/1469
Title: Model selection for incomplete and design-based samples
Authors: HENS, Niel 
AERTS, Marc 
MOLENBERGHS, Geert 
Issue Date: 2006
Source: STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 25(14). p. 2502-2520
Abstract: The Akaike information criterion, AIC, is one of the most frequently used methods to select one or a few good, optimal regression models from a set of candidate models. In case the sample is incomplete, the naive use of this criterion on the so-called complete cases can lead to the selection of poor or inappropriate models. A similar problem occurs when a sample based on a design with unequal selection probabilities, is treated as a simple random sample. In this paper, we consider a modification of AIC, based on reweighing the sample in analogy with the weighted Horvitz-Thompson estimates. It is shown that this weighted AIC-criterion provides better model choices for both incomplete and design-based samples. The use of the weighted AIC-criterion is illustrated on data from the Belgian Health Interview Survey, which motivated this research. Simulations show its performance in a variety of settings. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: missing data; weighted likelihood; model selection; complex designs; Akaike information criterion; WEIGHTED LIKELIHOOD METHODOLOGY; AKAIKE INFORMATION CRITERION; ESTIMATING EQUATIONS; REGRESSION; 2-STAGE; FIT;missing data; weighted likelihood; model selection; complex designs; Akaike information criterion
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/1469
ISSN: 0277-6715
e-ISSN: 1097-0258
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2559
ISI #: 000239052300011
Rights: (C) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2007
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hens2006.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version196.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Model_selection_for_incomplete_and_desig.pdfPeer-reviewed author version473.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.