Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25650
Title: Do clinicians prescribe exercise similarly in patients with different cardiovascular diseases? Findings from the EAPC EXPERT working group survey
Authors: HANSEN, Dominique 
ROVELO RUIZ, Gustavo 
Doherty, Patrick
Iliou, Marie-Christine
Vromen, Tom
Hinton, Sally
FREDERIX, Ines 
Wilhelm, Matthias
Schmid, Jean-Paul
Abreu, Ana
Ambrosetti, Marco
Garcia-Porrero, Esteban
CONINX, Karin 
DENDALE, Paul 
Issue Date: 2018
Source: European journal of preventive cardiology, 25 (7), pag. 682-691
Status: In Press
Abstract: Background: Although disease-specific exercise guidelines for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are widely available, it remains uncertain whether these different exercise guidelines are integrated properly for patients with different CVDs. The aim of this study was to assess the inter-clinician variance in exercise prescription for patients with various CVDs and to compare these prescriptions with recommendations from the EXercise Prescription in Everyday practice and Rehabilitative Training (EXPERT) tool, a digital decision support system for integrated state-of-the-art exercise prescription in CVD. Design: The study was a prospective observational survey. Methods: Fifty-three CV rehabilitation clinicians from nine European countries were asked to prescribe exercise intensity (based on percentage of peak heart rate (HRpeak)), frequency, session duration, programme duration and exercise type (endurance or strength training) for the same five patients. Exercise prescriptions were compared between clinicians, and relationships with clinician characteristics were studied. In addition, these exercise prescriptions were compared with recommendations from the EXPERT tool. Results: A large inter-clinician variance was found for prescribed exercise intensity (median (interquartile range (IQR)): 83 (13) % of HRpeak), frequency (median (IQR): 4 (2) days/week), session duration (median (IQR): 45 (18) min/session), programme duration (median (IQR): 12 (18) weeks), total exercise volume (median (IQR): 1215 (1961) peak-effort training hours) and prescription of strength training exercises (prescribed in 78% of all cases). Moreover, clinicians’ exercise prescriptions were significantly different from those of the EXPERT tool (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study reveals significant inter-clinician variance in exercise prescription for patients with different CVDs and disagreement with an integrated state-of-the-art system for exercise prescription, justifying the need for standardization efforts regarding integrated exercise prescription in CV rehabilitation.
Notes: Hansen, D (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Med & Life Sci, Rehabil Res Ctr, REVAL, Agoralaan,Bldg, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. dominique.hansen@uhasselt.be
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; exercise prescription; EXPERT tool
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25650
ISSN: 2047-4873
e-ISSN: 2047-4881
DOI: 10.1177/2047487318760888
ISI #: 000432062700003
Rights: (C) The European Society of Cardiology 2018
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2019
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
paper EXPERT survey revision1.pdfPeer-reviewed author version631.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
eurjpc0682.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version336.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

40
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

68
checked on Jul 15, 2022

Download(s)

104
checked on Jul 15, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.