Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28004
Title: The Timed Up and Go Test in Children: Does Protocol Choice Matter? A Systematic Review
Authors: VERBECQUE, Evi 
Schepens, Kirsten
There, Joke
Schepens, Benedicte
KLINGELS, Katrijn 
Hallemans, Ann
Issue Date: 2018
Source: Pediatric physical therapy, 31 (1), p. 22-31
Abstract: Purpose: Results on reliability and normative data for the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in children who are developing typically are systematically reviewed. Summary of Key Points: Six different TUG protocols are presented for which normative data are available for ages 3 to 18 years. TUG time is consistent within and between raters and sessions and is influenced by age. The choice of protocol, self-selected versus fastest walking speed, and use of a motivational aspect and of the outcome calculation affect TUG time as well as its consistency within and between sessions. Conclusions: A standard protocol for the TUG is lacking and should be developed with attention to reliability. Recommendations for Clinical Practice: If the TUG is to be used as a screening tool for dynamic balance control, clinicians need to apply protocols that include fastest walking speed motivation.
Notes: Verbecque, E (reprint author), Campus Drie Eiken, Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. evi.verbecque@uantwerpen.be
Keywords: children who are developing typically;reference values;reliability;“reproducibility of results” [mesh];TUG
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28004
ISSN: 0898-5669
e-ISSN: 1538-005X
DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000558
ISI #: 000457589100009
Rights: Copyright 2019 Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2020
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
verbecque2019.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version380.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
EVerbecque_TUG_Review_AUTHOR COPY.pdfPeer-reviewed author version639.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

86
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

158
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.