Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28742
Title: Identifying a consensus sample type to test for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, Trichomonas vaginalis and human papillomavirus
Authors: Coorevits, L.
Traen, A.
Binge, L.
Van Dorpe, J.
Praet, M.
Boelens, J.
PADALKO, Elizaveta 
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Source: Clinical microbiology and infection (Print), 24(12), p. 1328-1332
Abstract: Objectives: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a global cause of acute illness. Early detection plays a crucial role in interrupting transmission and preventing complications. However, the accessibility of STI testing is curbed by the lack of an overall preferred sample type. By means of a prospective study in female sex workers (FSW), we compared the sensitivity of samples from different anatomical sites in detecting Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Mycoplasma genitalium and human papillomavirus. Besides, we documented the prevalence of each STI in this high-risk population. Methods: We selected 303 FSW and tested them for each STI by nucleic acid amplification testing on two vaginal and cervical swabs from different manufacturers, cervical smear and first-void urine. The sensitivity of each sample type was compared for each infectious agent in order to identify a consensus sample type. Results: Vaginal swabs were superior to all other sample types, with an overall sensitivity of 86%. The sensitivity was the lowest for first-void urine, detecting only 63% of positive cases. The prevalence was 3.3% (10/299) for Neisseria gonorrhoeae; 9.0% (27/299) for Chlamydia trachomatis; 7.4% (22/298) for Trichomonas vaginalis; 10.8% (32/296) for Mycoplasma genitalium and 55.6% (158/284) for human papillomavirus. Conclusions: When testing for STIs, vaginal swabs are the sample of choice and first-void urine should be avoided. Designating (self-sampled) vaginal swabs as a consensus sample type enables harmonization of STI testing and extension of testing to large numbers of unscreened females. (C) 2018 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes: [Coorevits, L.; Boelens, J.; Padalko, E.] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Ghent, Belgium. [Coorevits, L.; Boelens, J.; Padalko, E.] Univ Ghent, Dept Clin Chem Microbiol & Immunol, Ghent, Belgium. [Traen, A.; Binge, L.] Pasop VZW, Ghent, Belgium. [Van Dorpe, J.; Praet, M.] Univ Ghent, Dept Pathol, Ghent, Belgium. [Praet, M.; Boelens, J.] Ghent Univ Hosp, Ghent, Belgium. [Padalko, E.] Hasselt Univ, Sch Life Sci, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Keywords: sexually transmitted infections; laboratory diagnosis; genital samples; chlamydia trachomatis; neisseria gonorrhoeae; human papillomavirus; mycoplasma genitalium; trichomonas vaginalis;Chlamydia trachomatis; Genital samples; Human papillomavirus; Laboratory diagnosis; Mycoplasma genitalium; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Sexually transmitted infections; Trichomonas vaginalis
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28742
ISSN: 1198-743X
e-ISSN: 1469-0691
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.013
ISI #: 000451052700019
Rights: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
coorevits2018.pdfPeer-reviewed author version618.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
PIIS1198743X18302234.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version844.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Page view(s)

166
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

154
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.