Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31914
Title: A comparative techno-economic assessment of biochar production from different residue streams using conventional and microwave pyrolysis
Authors: HAELDERMANS, Tom 
CAMPION, Luca 
KUPPENS, Tom 
VANREPPELEN, Kenny 
CUYPERS, Ann 
SCHREURS, Sonja 
Advisors: Schreurs, Sonja
Vanreppelen, Kenny
Cuypers, Ann
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: 
Source: Bioresource technology, 318 (Art N° 124083)
Abstract: A comparative techno-economic assessment and Monte Carlo risk analysis is performed on large scale (3 tonne/h) biochar production plants for conventional (CPS) and microwave (MWP) pyrolysis using six different residue streams. Both plants are viable with minimum selling prices between € 436/tonne and € 863/tonne for CPS, and between € 564/tonne and € 979/tonne for MWP. The CPS is therefore more viable than MWP as it is a simpler and more established technology. However, a 20 % biochar price increase due to higher biochar quality makes the MWP technology more viable. Nevertheless, the discounted payback period remains higher than this of CPS due to the increased CAPEX. Biochar price is the most important determinant of a biochar production plant’s feasibility, motivating the need for economic and market research on biochar prices in function of biochar characteristics to reduce fluctuations in widely varying biochar prices.
Keywords: Conventional pyrolysis;Microwave pyrolysis;Economics;Biochar;Techno-economic assessment
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31914
ISSN: 0960-8524
e-ISSN: 1873-2976
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124083
ISI #: WOS:000593738900007
Rights: 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2022
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.57 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

76
checked on Apr 8, 2024

Page view(s)

126
checked on Jul 5, 2022

Download(s)

56
checked on Jul 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.