Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47636
Title: Exercise Echocardiography for Risk Stratification in Unexplained Dyspnea: The Incremental Value of the Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure/Slope
Authors: FALTER, Maarten 
BEKHUIS, Youri 
L'Hoyes, Wouter
MILANI, Mauricio 
HOEDEMAKERS, Sarah 
Soens, Lucie
MOURA FERREIRA, Sara 
DHONT, Sebastiaan 
PAUWELS, Rik 
Jacobs , Annemie
De Schutter, Stephanie
DELPIRE, Boris 
VERBEECK, Johan 
STASSEN, Jan 
Gevaert, Andreas B.
Debonnaire, Philippe
van de Bruaene, Alexander
BERTRAND, Philippe 
HERBOTS, Lieven 
Jasaityte, Ruta
VERBRUGGE, Frederik 
CLAESSEN, Guido 
VERWERFT, Jan 
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: MOSBY-ELSEVIER
Source: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 38 (10) , p. 875 -889
Abstract: Background Patients with unexplained dyspnea and an elevated mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP)/cardiac output (CO) slope on invasive hemodynamic assessment during exercise have worse clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incremental prognostic value of the noninvasive mPAP/CO slope in addition to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) probability scores and diastolic stress testing in patients with unexplained dyspnea. Methods In a multicenter cohort study involving six Belgian dyspnea clinics, patients with unexplained dyspnea underwent exercise echocardiography for mPAP/CO slope assessment. Positive HFpEF scores were defined as HFA-PEFF (Heart Failure Association pretest probability echocardiography, functional testing, final diagnosis) score >= 5 and H2FPEF (heavy, hypertensive, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, elder, filling pressure) score >= 6. The outcome evaluated was a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Results Among 2,452 patients (mean age, 63 +/- 15 years; 53% women), mPAP/CO slope > 3.5 mm Hg <middle dot> L-1 <middle dot> min(-1) best predicted adverse outcomes. The prognostic value of the mPAP/CO slope was greater in patients with negative HFpEF scores than in those with positive scores (interaction P = .02). The mPAP/CO slope remained independently prognostic after adjustment for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (hazard ratio [HR], 2.26; 95% CI, 1.33-3.82) and for HFpEF scores and diastolic stress testing (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.37-2.88), whereas exercise tricuspid regurgitant velocity did not. Both HFpEF score-negative patients with slope > 3.5 mm Hg <middle dot> L-1 <middle dot> min(-1) (HR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.81-4.95) and HFpEF score-positive patients (HR, 6.29; 95% CI, 4.25-9.31) showed significantly higher risk compared with HFpEF score-negative patients with slope <= 3.5 mm Hg <middle dot> L-1 <middle dot> min(-1). Conclusions The mPAP/CO slope, unlike exercise tricuspid regurgitant velocity, adds prognostic value beyond natriuretic peptides, HFpEF scores, and diastolic stress testing, identifying high-risk patients with exercise-induced hemodynamic abnormalities who may benefit from invasive confirmation and closer follow-up.
Notes: Verwerft, J (corresponding author), Jessa Hosp, Heart Ctr, Stadsomvaart 11, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium.
jan.verwerft@jessazh.be
Keywords: mPAP/CO slope;Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction;Dyspnea;Echocardiography;Exercise testing
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47636
ISSN: 0894-7317
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.06.007
ISI #: 001590124100001
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.