Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47972
Title: A comparative analysis of mobile phone data and travel surveys in understanding travel behaviour
Authors: Gong, Suxia
Saadi, Ismail
Teller, Jacques
COOLS, Mario 
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: SPRINGER
Source: Transportation,
Status: Early view
Abstract: This study evaluates the comparability of aggregated mobile phone data (MPD) derived from passive network signalling events and traditional travel survey data for urban transport planning, using the province of Li & egrave;ge as a case study. Our analysis demonstrates that while MPD captures a higher density of origin-destination (OD) connections, it cannot fully replicate all flows observed in surveys, underscoring the need for a complementary approach between the two data sources. Key mobility indicators, including average trip rates, hourly trip volumes, and structural patterns in daily OD matrices, show strong alignment. This structural similarity is rigorously quantified using a Mean Structural Similarity Index with a distance decay effect. Furthermore, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests confirm comparable trip length distributions between the sources. While MPD-based population estimates closely match official 3:00 AM census counts, discrepancies in specific zones highlight potential pitfalls for real-time population mapping. Our findings confirm that MPD provides a robust and valuable complement to traditional surveys, particularly in contexts with limited or infrequent survey data. The study offers critical insights for integrating MPD into urban policy planning, emphasizing its utility for validation and its caveats for population estimation.
Notes: Saadi, I (corresponding author), Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, MRC Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge, England.
suxia.gong@uliege.be; is558@cam.ac.uk; jacques.teller@uliege.be;
mario.cools@uliege.be
Keywords: Travel survey data;Mobile phone data;Origin-destination matrices;Population counts;Trip length distributions
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/47972
ISSN: 0049-4488
e-ISSN: 1572-9435
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-025-10708-4
ISI #: 001636979200001
Rights: The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s11116-025-10708-4.pdfEarly view2.85 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.